[FOSS_health] Fwd: [participants] Re: OSHCA inter-operability list

[Jason Tan Boon Teck]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jason Tan Boon Teck <tanboonteck at gmail.com>
Date: May 16, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [participants] Re: OSHCA inter-operability list
To: OSHCA Conference participants <participants at oshca.org>
Cc: alvin.marcelo at telehealth.ph


<quote>
Q: Is HL7 V3 a replacement for V2.x?  Is there an upgrade path?

A: ... Early adopters of V3 are typically in a "green field" situation
with no installed HL7 systems. Some implementations have been of a
academic/research nature.

So far there is no upgrade path from existing V2.x messages to V3 messages.
<unquote>

This looks scary. [shudders]


jason

On 5/16/07, Klaus D Veil <Klaus at veil.net.au> wrote:
> Also, if some of you want a simple HL7 FAQ (or provide this to a colleague),
> go to: www.HL7.com.au/FAQ.htm
>
> Klaus
>
>
> HL7 Australia
> ___________________________________________
> PO Box 3289, WESTON CREEK 2611, Australia
> Phone: +61 412 746 457   Fax: +61 2 9475 0685
> E-mail: Chair at HL7.org.au    Web: www.HL7.org.au
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: participants-bounces at oshca.org [mailto:participants-bounces at oshca.org]
> On Behalf Of Lee Seldon
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2007 13:16
> To: alvin.marcelo at telehealth.ph; OSHCA Conference participants
> Subject: [participants] Re: OSHCA inter-operability list
>
> Alvin Boh et al.
> This interoperability discussion seems to be progressing faster than I
> expected, but
> 1) I would REALLY prefer to pursue it in a dedicated list, so as not to
> clutter up everybody's email. An OSHCA list would be most appropriate, but
> otherwise maybe a Yahoo group or even Skype, or we could each make our own
> list (of one another).
> 2) The point-to-point interface would be quickest, but I myself would only
> be interested in a generic approach involving all applications, so as to
> establish interoperability not only here and now, but also for the future.
> 3) It should not be necessary (or useful) for everybody to study HL7. As
> long as at least one person (project manager?) knows enough, he/she can
> answer questions.
> 4) http://www.ahml.com.au/ is the best place to test your message
> compliance.
> Lee
> _______________________________________________
> participants mailing list
> participants at oshca.org
> http://mailman.oshca.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/participants
>
> _______________________________________________
> participants mailing list
> participants at oshca.org
> http://mailman.oshca.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/participants
>


--
Jason Tan Boon Teck


-- 
Jason Tan Boon Teck